Consolidated Metal Products, Inc. v. American Petroleum Institute
District Court, District of Columbia
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER
BARRINGTON D. PARKER, District Judge:
In this civil antitrust action the plaintiff, Consolidated Metal Products, Inc. (Consolidated), has charged the American Petroleum Institute (API), LTV Corporation (LTV), Continental Emsco, Co., Inc. (Emsco) and the Dover Corporation (Dover), with engaging in a conspiracy to discourage and prevent the sale of Consolidated’s oil production equipment. Specifically, Consolidated alleges that API and the other defendants wrongfully engaged in a group boycott and wrongfully denied Consolidated the right to the API monogram or seal of…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Van Dusen v. BarrackSupreme Court of the United States · 1964
- Factors Etc., Inc. And Boxcar Enterprises Inc. v. Pro Arts, Inc. And Stop and Shop Companies, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1978
- Securities and Exchange Commission v. Savoy Industries, Inc. Appeal of S. Mort ZimmermanCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1978
- Islamic Republic of Iran v. Boeing Co.District Court, District of Columbia · 1979
- American Standard, Inc. v. Bendix Corp.District Court, W.D. Missouri · 1980
3Cited by19 opinions
- The Wilderness Society v. BabbittDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2000
- Thayer/Patricof Education Funding, L.L.C. v. Pryor Resources, Inc.District Court, District of Columbia · 2002
- Armco Steel Co., LP v. CSX Corp.District Court, District of Columbia · 1991
- Shawnee Tribe v. United StatesDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2002
- Onyeneho v. Allstate InsuranceDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2006
14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.