Legal Opinion

Wohlgemuth v. Pearson

Nebraska Supreme Court

Decided November 6, 1979No. 42140PublishedCited by 22 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtWhite, J.

In this appeal from the District Court for Seward County, Nebraska, the District Court reversed the finding of the appellant, the director of the Department of Motor Vehicles, who had determined that the appellee, David L. Wohlgemuth, had failed to comply with this state’s implied consent law by refusing to submit to a body fluid test when properly requested to do so. When we review the findings of the trial court de novo as in equity, Wiseman v. Sullivan, 190 Neb. 724, 211 N. W. 2d 906, we take into account that on appeal to the District Court the burden of proof is on the licensee to…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Campbell v. Superior CourtArizona Supreme Court · 1971
  2. Wiseman v. SullivanNebraska Supreme Court · 1973
  3. Rusho v. JohnsNebraska Supreme Court · 1970
  4. State v. HurbeanOhio Court of Appeals · 1970
  5. MacKey v. Director of the Department of Motor VehiclesNebraska Supreme Court · 1975

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by22 opinions

  1. Hoyle v. PetersonNebraska Supreme Court · 1984
  2. Martinez v. PetersonNebraska Supreme Court · 1982
  3. Winter v. PetersonNebraska Supreme Court · 1981
  4. State v. BrittainNebraska Supreme Court · 1982
  5. Jamros v. JensenNebraska Supreme Court · 1985

17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API