Legal Opinion
Hoyle v. Peterson
Nebraska Supreme Court
Decided January 27, 1984No. 82-656PublishedCited by 24 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtShanahan, J.
Michael Eugene Hoyle appeals the judgment of the district court for Lancaster County, Nebraska, affirming an order of Harry “Pete” Peterson, director of the Department of Motor Vehicles, State of Nebraska, namely, revocation of Hoyle’s Nebraska operator’s license and operating privileges for 6 months on account of Hoyle’s refusal to submit to a test authorized by Nebraska’s implied consent law, Neb. Rev. Stat. §§ 39-669.08 et seq. (Reissue 1978). We affirm.
Hoyle’s driving his car erratically at a high rate of speed on a Lincoln street attracted the attention of Officer R. S. Kubicek of the…
2Cases cited16 opinions
- State v. PandoliNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1970
- Zidell v. BrightCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1968
- Krueger v. FultonSupreme Court of Iowa · 1969
- Peterson v. StateSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1977
- Wiseman v. SullivanNebraska Supreme Court · 1973
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by24 opinions
- Toby Joseph Welch v. Iowa Department of Transportation, Motor Vehicle DivisionSupreme Court of Iowa · 2011
- Pruitt v. State, Department of Public Safety, Division of Motor VehiclesAlaska Supreme Court · 1992
- State v. SuazoNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1994
- Johnson v. Division of Motor VehiclesMontana Supreme Court · 1985
- Fulmer v. JensenNebraska Supreme Court · 1986
19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.