Legal Opinion

Martinez v. Peterson

Nebraska Supreme Court

Decided July 16, 1982No. 44302PublishedCited by 19 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtWhite, J.

The Director of Motor Vehicles appeals from an order of the District Court for York County, Nebraska, which reversed and set aside an order by the director revoking the operator’s license and driving privileges of the appellee for a period of 6 months for failure to submit to a chemical test of his blood or urine. We affirm.

In his petition on appeal to the District Court, Jose R. Martinez alleged that he does not speak or understand the English language and did not understand the explanation of the arresting officer concerning the “Implied Consent Law.” Martinez further alleged that the…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. State v. HurbeanOhio Court of Appeals · 1970
  2. Wohlgemuth v. PearsonNebraska Supreme Court · 1979
  3. Zadina v. WeedlunNebraska Supreme Court · 1971
  4. Wagner v. Loup River Public Power DistrictNebraska Supreme Court · 1948
  5. Winter v. PetersonNebraska Supreme Court · 1981

3Cited by19 opinions

  1. People v. WegielnikIllinois Supreme Court · 1992
  2. Smith v. State, Dept. of Motor VehiclesNebraska Supreme Court · 1995
  3. State v. GarciaSupreme Court of Iowa · 2008
  4. Hoyle v. PetersonNebraska Supreme Court · 1984
  5. Yokoyama v. Commissioner of Public SafetyCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 1984

14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API