Legal Opinion

Hutz v. Workers' Compensation Appeal Board

Commonwealth Court of Pennsylvania

Decided September 7, 2016No. 2140 C.D. 2015PublishedCited by 20 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION BY

JUDGE SIMPSON

This workers’ compensation appeal involves cancer contracted by a Philadelphia firefighter. In particular, Earl Hutz (Claimant) petitions for review of an order of the Workers’ Compensation Appeal Board (Board) affirming a decision of a Workers’ Compensation Judge (WCJ). The WCJ denied a claim petition seeking total disability benefits under Section 108(r) of the Workers’ Compensation Act (Act) 1 for prostate cancer he allegedly contracted .as a result of exposure to carcinogens as a firefighter for the City of Philadelphia (Employer). Claimant contends the decisions of…

2Cases cited16 opinions

  1. Frye v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1923
  2. Grady v. Frito-Lay, Inc.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 2003
  3. House v. Workmen's Compensation Appeal BoardSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1993
  4. Phoenixville Hospital v. Workers' Compensation Appeal BoardSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 2013
  5. Pawlosky v. Workmen's Compensation Appeal BoardSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1987

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by20 opinions

  1. Fargo v. Workers' Compensation Appeal BoardCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 2016
  2. Demchenko v. Workers' Compensation Appeal BoardCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 2016
  3. Steele v. Workers' Compensation Appeal Board (Findlay Township)Commonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 2017
  4. Capaldi v. Workers' Compensation Appeal Board (City of Philadelphia)Commonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 2017
  5. B. Jorgenson v. WCAB (PNC Financial Services Group, Inc.)Commonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 2017

15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API