Legal Opinion

State v. Moon

Court of Appeals of Minnesota

Decided July 13, 1990No. CX-89-1734PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

GARDEBRING, Judge.

This is an appeal from the trial court’s denial of appellant’s motion to strike the language from his February 1989 order of discharge which prohibits his right to ship, transport, possess or receive firearms for 10 years. He argues that because his felony conviction was reduced to misdemeanor status, the firearms restriction is not applicable. Further, he argues that Minn.Stat. § 609.165, subd. la (1988) is an ex post facto law as applied to him. We reverse.

FACTS

The facts are undisputed. Appellant Joseph Moon pleaded guilty to felony theft in December 1987 for acts…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. United States v. Patrick Joseph MatterCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1987
  2. State v. ClipperCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 1988
  3. State v. SkramstadCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 1988
  4. State v. OlsonCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 1990

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. State v. MoonSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1990
  2. State v. FosterCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 2001
  3. State v. MoonCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 1990

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API