Legal Opinion
State v. Moon
Court of Appeals of Minnesota
Decided July 13, 1990No. CX-89-1734Published
1Opinion of the Court
455 N.W.2d 509 (1990)
STATE of Minnesota, Respondent,
v.
Joseph Chan MOON, Appellant.
No. CX-89-1734.
Court of Appeals of Minnesota.
May 15, 1990.
Review Granted July 13, 1990.
Hubert H. Humphrey, III, Atty. Gen., Lori M. Mittag, Sp. Asst. Atty. Gen., St. Paul, for respondent.
Robert M. Wallner, Kief, Fuller, Baer, Wallner & Rodgers, Ltd., Bemidji, for appellant.
Considered and decided by RANDALL, P.J., and FOLEY, and GARDEBRING, JJ.
OPINION
GARDEBRING, Judge.
This is an appeal from the trial court's denial of appellant's motion to strike the language from his February 1989 order of discharge which…
Also in this document: Concurrence.
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Weaver v. GrahamSupreme Court of the United States · 1981
- United States v. Patrick Joseph MatterCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1987
- State v. ClipperCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 1988
- State v. SkramstadCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 1988
- State v. MoonCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 1990
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.