Legal Opinion · Concurrence

Stranahan v. Fred Meyer, Inc.

Oregon Supreme Court

Decided September 14, 2000No. CC 9110-06504; CA A88372; SC S45547Published

1ConcurrenceVan Hoomissen, J.

The issue on review in this tort action for false arrest is whether plaintiff, Stranahan, had a state constitutional right to collect initiative petition signatures at the Fred Meyer store on Southeast 82nd Avenue and Foster Road in Portland. Defendant, Fred Meyer, argues that it cannot be held liable for that tort because Stranahan was committing criminal trespass at the time of her arrest.1 Stranahan *67argues that she was not committing criminal trespass at the time of her arrest because, she asserts, she had a right under Article IV, section 1, of the Oregon Constitution2 to enter and remain…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Marsh v. AlabamaSupreme Court of the United States · 1946
  2. Alderwood Associates v. Washington Environmental CouncilWashington Supreme Court · 1981
  3. Lloyd Corporation v. WhiffenOregon Supreme Court · 1993
  4. Lloyd Corporation v. WhiffenOregon Supreme Court · 1989
  5. Huffman and Wright Logging Co. v. WadeOregon Supreme Court · 1993

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API