Legal Opinion

Robert Jeffrey FARMER, Petitioner-Appellee, v. E.K. McDANIEL; Attorney General of the State of Nevada, Respondents-Appellants

Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit

Decided October 29, 1996No. 95-99016PublishedCited by 45 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

RYMER, Circuit Judge:

This appeal requires us to consider a novel, but narrow question: whether an amended third habeas corpus petition by a prisoner in state custody may be subject to dismissal for abuse of the writ even though prior petitions were dismissed for failure to exhaust and thus were not reviewed on the merits.1 The district court thought not, but the State of Nevada wants the opportunity to argue that Robert Jeffrey Farmer has filed a series of petitions with new, unexhausted claims to avoid (and delay for more than seven years) a review of his sentence and conviction in federal…

2Cases cited47 opinions

  1. Younger v. HarrisSupreme Court of the United States · 1971
  2. Cohen v. Beneficial Industrial Loan Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1949
  3. Rose v. LundySupreme Court of the United States · 1982
  4. McCleskey v. ZantSupreme Court of the United States · 1991
  5. Sanders v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1963

42 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by45 opinions

  1. Slack v. McDanielSupreme Court of the United States · 2000
  2. Turner v. DuncanCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1998
  3. Michael Anthony v. Steven Cambra, Jr., WardenCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2000
  4. Alaimalo v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2011
  5. Slack v. McDanielSupreme Court of the United States · 2000

40 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API