Legal Opinion

Alaimalo v. United States

Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit

Decided February 28, 2011No. 08-56349PublishedCited by 162 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion by Judge B. FLETCHER; Dissent by Judge KORMAN.

ORDERS

B. FLETCHER, Circuit Judge:

The opinion filed on February 28, 2011 is amended as follows:

1. On page 2944 of the slip opinion, 636 F.3d at 1098, delete the following sentence:

We conclude that neither doctrine bars consideration of Alaimalo’s petition because failure to entertain his claim of actual innocence would constitute manifest injustice.

2. Replace that sentence with:

We conclude that neither doctrine bars consideration of Alaimalo’s petition.

3. On page 2944 of the slip opinion, 636 F.3d at 1098, delete the following sentence:

Even…

2Cases cited42 opinions

  1. Slack v. McDanielSupreme Court of the United States · 2000
  2. Bousley v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1998
  3. Engle v. IsaacSupreme Court of the United States · 1982
  4. Spencer v. KemnaSupreme Court of the United States · 1998
  5. McCleskey v. ZantSupreme Court of the United States · 1991

37 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by162 opinions

  1. Edwin Marrero v. Richard IvesCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2012
  2. Muth v. FondrenCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2012
  3. Jennie McCormack v. Mark HiedemanCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2012
  4. United States v. Clifford WinklesCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2015
  5. United States v. WashingtonCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2011

157 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API