Legal Opinion

People v. Mitchell

Appellate Court of Illinois

Decided February 1, 1984No. 82-77PublishedCited by 20 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtJustice Van Deusen

The defendant, Marshall Mitchell III, appeals from his conviction and sentence for the offense of burglary (Ill. Rev. Stat. 19779, ch. 38, par. 19 — 1(a)). His first contention on appeal is that his conviction must be reversed and the cause remanded to the trial court because the trial judge abused his discretion by denying a defense motion to reopen voir dire as to one of the jurors.

We agree.

During voir dire, juror Thomas J. Maloney was asked by the court “have you ever been a victim of a crime?” to which he responded, “No, I haven’t.” After the first panel, of which Maloney was a member,…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. People v. ColeIllinois Supreme Court · 1973
  2. People v. WittedAppellate Court of Illinois · 1979
  3. The People v. KurthIllinois Supreme Court · 1966
  4. Pekelder v. Edgewater Automotive Co.Illinois Supreme Court · 1977
  5. People v. OliverAppellate Court of Illinois · 1977

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by20 opinions

  1. People v. HarrisIllinois Supreme Court · 1988
  2. People v. ChildressIllinois Supreme Court · 1994
  3. Kingston v. TurnerIllinois Supreme Court · 1987
  4. People v. JohnsonAppellate Court of Illinois · 1991
  5. People v. AdkinsIllinois Supreme Court · 2010

15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API