Legal Opinion

Taft v. Bowers

Supreme Court of the United States

Decided February 18, 1929No. 16 and 17PublishedCited by 135 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtJustice McReynolds

Petitioners, who are donees of stocks, seek to recover income taxes exacted because of advancement in the market value of those stocks while owned by the donors. The facts are not in dispute. Both causes must turn upon the effect of paragraph (2), § 202, Revenue Act, 1921, (c. 136, 42 Stat. 227) which prescribes the basis for estimating taxable gain when one disposes of property which came to him by gift. The records do not differ essentially and a statement of the material circumstances disclosed by No. 16 will suffice.

During the calendar years 1921 and 1922, the father of petitioner…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Eisner v. MacOmberSupreme Court of the United States · 1920
  2. United States v. PhellisSupreme Court of the United States · 1921
  3. Irwin v. GavitSupreme Court of the United States · 1925

3Cited by135 opinions

  1. Helvering v. GowranSupreme Court of the United States · 1937
  2. Tyler v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1930
  3. Milliken v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1931
  4. Helvering v. New York Trust Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1934
  5. Helvering v. City Bank Farmers Trust Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1935

130 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API