Legal Opinion

Gainer v. Wal-Mart Stores East, L.P.

District Court, E.D. Michigan

Decided March 28, 2013No. Case No. 2:11-cv-14331PublishedCited by 8 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION AND ORDER GRANTING DEFENDANT’S MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT

GERALD E. ROSEN, Chief Judge.

I. INTRODUCTION

This relatively simple slip-and-fall case presents a law school examination-type question which tests the boundaries of the present sense impression and excited utterance exceptions to the general prohibition against hearsay testimony. Specifically, it examines the extent to which hearsay statements themselves can be used to prove the actions and circumstances surrounding the event which actually prompted their utterance. -

On August 30, 2011, Plaintiff Diane Gainer filed this action…

2Cases cited23 opinions

  1. Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
  2. Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
  3. Alexander v. CareSourceCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2009
  4. Skinner v. Square D Co.Michigan Supreme Court · 1994
  5. Lugo v. Ameritech Corp., Inc.Michigan Supreme Court · 2001

18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. Libby Silas v. Target CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2014
  2. Betty v. California Pizza Kitchen, Inc.District Court, E.D. Michigan · 2021
  3. Hawthorne v. Wal-Mart Stores East, LPDistrict Court, E.D. Michigan · 2021
  4. Mitchell v. Target CorporationDistrict Court, D. Maryland · 2019
  5. Quincy Saenz v. Kohl's Department StoresCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2020

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API