Legal Opinion

Michael S. Molen v. Ronald D. Christian

Idaho Supreme Court

Decided January 24, 2017No. Docket 43755PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtW. Jones, Justice

I. Nature of the Case

Appellant, Michael Scott Molen (“Molen”), appeals the district court’s summary judgment dismissal of his legal malpractice action. The malpractice action stems from Respondent, Ronald Christian’s (“Christian”), representation of Molen in a criminal case. The crux of this appeal is whether the statute of limitations on Molen’s malpractice cause of action accrued upon Molen’s initial criminal conviction or when Molen was later exonerated.

II. Factual and Procedural Background

On September 19, 2005, Molen was charged with lewd conduct with a minor child, S.Z. Molen pleaded not…

2Cases cited34 opinions

  1. Brady v. MarylandSupreme Court of the United States · 1963
  2. Peeler v. Hughes & LuceTexas Supreme Court · 1995
  3. Stevens v. BisphamOregon Supreme Court · 1993
  4. Gebhardt v. O'ROURKEMichigan Supreme Court · 1994
  5. Bailey v. TuckerSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1993

29 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. Chad Dockter v. Diane Lozano, as an individual and in her official capacity Eric Alden, as an individual and in his official capacity Donald Miller, as an individual and in his official capacity Robin Cooper, as an individual and in her official capacity and the Office of the State Public DefenderWyoming Supreme Court · 2020
  2. Yu v. Idaho State Univ.Idaho Supreme Court · 2019
  3. Cooke v. WilliamsSupreme Court of Connecticut · 2024
  4. Mark O'Hara Wright v. Andrew C. Graves, Esq.Court of Appeals of Virginia · 2023
  5. Mark O'Hara Wright v. Andrew C. Graves, Esq.Court of Appeals of Virginia · 2023

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API