Stout v. Woods
Indiana Supreme Court
From the Wabash Cifcuit Court.
1Opinion of the CourtElliott, C. J.
— It is settled by many decisions, that, where a ruling upon a motion for a new trial can not be intelligently *109understood or justly reviewed without an examination of all the evidence, it must all be brought into the record by a bill of exceptions, framed and authenticated as the law requires, or the appeal will be unavailing." '.Johnson v. Wiley, 74 Ind. 233; Wells v. Wells, 71 Ind. 509. j The.'evidence is not all in the record before us. The statement of the judge, written in the bill, reads thus: “ The foregoing, with accompanying objections, is presented to me by plaintiff’s counsel as a…
2Cases cited3 opinions
- Muncey v. JoestIndiana Supreme Court · 1881
- Johnson v. WileyIndiana Supreme Court · 1881
- Estate of Wells v. WellsIndiana Supreme Court · 1880
3Cited by20 opinions
- Quarl v. AbbettIndiana Supreme Court · 1885
- Cavanaugh v. SmithIndiana Supreme Court · 1882
- Jackson v. State ex rel. DyarIndiana Supreme Court · 1885
- Sinclair v. GunzenhauserIndiana Supreme Court · 1912
- Lamb v. CainIndiana Supreme Court · 1891
15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.