Legal Opinion

Millsap v. Williamson

Supreme Court of Alabama

Decided October 2, 1975No. SC 400PublishedCited by 11 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

BLOODWORTH, Justice.

Appeal by appellant (plaintiff below) from a judgment and jury verdict for appellees (defendants below) after motion for new trial was overruled.

This action was commenced, and trial had, before the advent of the A.R.C.P. Prior to the taking of testimony in the case-in-chief, appellees filed a motion in limine, asking the court to restrain appellant’s counsel from making any comment before the jury concerning certain offers of compromise made by appellee City of Evergreen. The court granted appellee’s motion to which appellant duly excepted. Upon being questioned by…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Hubbard Bros. Construction v. C. F. Halstead Contractor, Inc.Supreme Court of Alabama · 1975
  2. Graves v. WildsmithSupreme Court of Alabama · 1965
  3. Roll v. DockerySupreme Court of Alabama · 1929
  4. Coker v. Ryder Truck LinesSupreme Court of Alabama · 1971
  5. National Security Fire & Casualty Co. v. HodginCourt of Civil Appeals of Alabama · 1975

3Cited by11 opinions

  1. Harris v. M & S TOYOTA, INC.Supreme Court of Alabama · 1991
  2. Kekua v. Kaiser Foundation HospitalHawaii Supreme Court · 1979
  3. Donaldson v. BuckSupreme Court of Alabama · 1976
  4. Norfolk Southern R.R. v. ThompsonSupreme Court of Alabama · 1996
  5. Langham Small Motors v. ThomasCourt of Civil Appeals of Alabama · 1980

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API