Legal Opinion
T-MOBILE USA, INC. v. City of Anacortes
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
Decided July 20, 2009No. 08-35493PublishedCited by 25 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
CALLAHAN, Circuit Judge:
The City of Anacortes (the “City”) appeals the district court’s determination that the City’s denial of an application by T-Mobile USA, Inc. (“T-Mobile”) to erect a 116-foot monopole antenna at a particular location violates a provision of the Telecommunications Act of 1996, 47 U.S.C. § 332(c)(7)(B). The district court found that T-Mobile’s proposal was the least in trusive means to close a significant gap in its wireless service in the City, and that the City’s denial was not supported by substantial evidence. We determine that, although the district court did not…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Cellular Telephone Company, Doing Business as at & T Wireless Services v. The Town of Oyster Bay and the Town Board of the Town of Oyster BayCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1999
- Sprint Spectrum, L.P. v. WillothCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1999
- Sprint Telephony PCS, L.P. v. County of San DiegoCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2008
- T-Mobile Central, LLC v. Unified Government Wyandotte County KsCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2008
- Nextel West Corp. v. Unity TownshipCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2002
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by25 opinions
- Omnipoint Holdings, Inc. v. City of CranstonCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 2009
- Sprint PCS Assets, L.L.C. Ex Rel. Sprint Telephony PCS, LP v. City of Palos Verdes EstatesCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2009
- Helcher v. Dearborn CountyCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2010
- American Tower Corporation v. City of San DiegoCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2014
- State v. SteeleConnecticut Appellate Court · 2017
20 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.