Legal Opinion
Lyman Lumber Co. v. Three Rivers Co.
Court of Appeals of Minnesota
Decided February 17, 1987No. C3-86-1270PublishedCited by 5 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
NIERENGARTEN, Judge.
Appellant Lyman Lumber Company (Lyman) sued respondent Three Rivers Company (Three Rivers), a Minnesota partnership consisting of Duane R. Jones, Bernard R. Jones and George W. Bunn, for payment of a credit account. The trial court found that Three Rivers was not responsible because Lyman failed to establish that the person using the account was an agent of Three Rivers. Lyman appeals. We affirm.
FACTS
In the spring of 1988, respondents Duane R. Jones, Bernard R. Jones and George W. Bunn planned to form a partnership known as the Three Rivers Company for home…
2Cases cited10 opinions
- Sauter v. WasemillerSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1986
- Vacura v. Haar's Equipment, Inc.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1985
- Dispatch Printing Co. v. National Bank of CommerceSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1910
- City of Minnetonka v. CarlsonSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1980
- West Concord Conservation Club, Inc. v. ChilsonSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1981
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by5 opinions
- Trustees of the Graphic Communications International Union Upper Midwest Local 1M Health & Welfare Plan v. BjorkedalCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 2008
- Lyman Lumber Co. v. Three Rivers Co.Court of Appeals of Minnesota · 1987
- Protege Biomedical, LLC v. Z-Medica, LLCDistrict Court, D. Minnesota · 2019
- Samuel Zean v. Choice Hotels InternationalCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 2020
- Trustees of the Graphic Commun v. Olaf BjorkedalCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 2008