Legal Opinion
Gruver-Cooley Jade Corporation v. Perlis
Court of Appeals of Maryland
Decided March 12, 1969No. [No. 300, September Term, 1968.]PublishedCited by 7 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtMcWilliams, J.
The trial judge, Shure, J., declared the plat of “Blocks Q and R” of Luxmanor “to have been illegally approved” by the Montgomery County Planning Board 1 (board) and, consequently, to be null and void. At the core of the dispute is the question whether the word “board” as used in the applicable section of the Montgomery County Zoning Ordinance means the Montgomery County Planning Board or the Montgomery County Board of Appeals. The appellants are The Maryland-National Capital Park and Planning Commission (Commis sion), Erwin W. Bucklin, Director of Inspection and Licenses of Montgomery County…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Reiche v. Smythe, CollectorSupreme Court of the United States · 1872
- Maguire v. StateCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1949
- Pittman v. Housing AuthorityCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1942
- Homac Corp. v. Sun Oil Co.New York Supreme Court · 1930
- Commonwealth v. CurleyMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1869
3Cited by7 opinions
- Swarthmore Co. v. KaestnerCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1971
- In the Matter of David LamsonCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1972
- (2000), Maryland Attorney General Reports2000
- Colleges and Universities Public Safety – The Johns Hopkins University Police Department – The Extent of the Police Department's Off-Campus Jurisdiction – How Community Support for that Jurisdiction is Determined, Maryland Attorney General Reports2020
- Maryland Attorney General Opinion 105OAG040, Maryland Attorney General Reports2020
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.