Legal Opinion

(2000)

Maryland Attorney General Reports

Decided July 10, 2000Published

1Opinion of the Court

Dear The Honorable Thomas V. Mike Miller, Jr.

You have asked for our opinion concerning one of the constitutional requirements that governs the drawing of legislative districts in Maryland. Specifically, you have asked whether a district that is intersected by navigable water satisfies the requirement of contiguity — i.e., that the district consist of adjoining territory — when no bridge, tunnel, or ferry connects the land on either side of the water.

Following a review of the history of the constitutional provision, Maryland case law, and case law on analogous provisions in other…

2Cases cited12 opinions

  1. Matter of Sherrill v. . O'BrienNew York Court of Appeals · 1907
  2. Lawyer v. Department of JusticeSupreme Court of the United States · 1997
  3. Schneider v. RockefellerNew York Court of Appeals · 1972
  4. In Re the Legislative Districting of StateCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1984
  5. Legislative Redistricting CasesCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 2006

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API