Legal Opinion
Tatro v. Esham
Superior Court of Delaware
Decided March 6, 1975PublishedCited by 13 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
335 A.2d 623 (1975)
Clifton L. TATRO, Plaintiff,
v.
Katheryn ESHAM et al., Defendants.
Superior Court of Delaware, Sussex.
March 6, 1975.
H. Clay Davis, III, Georgetown, for plaintiff.
John E. Messick, of Tunnell & Raysor, Georgetown, for defendants.
OPINION
CHRISTIE, Judge.
Defendants have moved to dismiss the complaint on the ground that the plaintiff has failed to state a claim upon which relief can be granted. In the alternative, defendants request a more definite statement of the facts supporting the complaint.
Plaintiff is a high school principal in the Woodbridge School District. Defendants are…
2Cases cited23 opinions
- Bradley v. FisherSupreme Court of the United States · 1872
- Randall v. BrighamSupreme Court of the United States · 1869
- Rainier's Dairies v. Raritan Valley Farms, Inc.Supreme Court of New Jersey · 1955
- Peck v. Tribune Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1909
- Corrigan v. . Bobbs-Merrill Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1920
18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by13 opinions
- Ramunno v. CawleySupreme Court of Delaware · 1998
- Barker v. HuangSupreme Court of Delaware · 1992
- Nix v. SawyerSuperior Court of Delaware · 1983
- McLaughlin v. CopelandDistrict Court, D. Delaware · 1978
- Gersh v. AmbroseCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1981
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.