Hodge v. Dunlop
North Dakota Supreme Court
1Opinion of the Court
CíiRisttaNSON, J.
This is an action to restore and foreclose a certain mortgage alleged to have been released through mistake. /The material and undisputed facts are as follows: Cecil Dunlop and Maud Dunlop (husband and wife) were the joint owners of 160 acres of land situated in Stutsman county in this state. On June 6, 1916, they executed and delivered a first mortgage on said land to W. B. S. Trimble Company to secure the sum of $1,750. That mortgage was duly recorded in the office of the register of deeds of said county on June 9, 1916. On January 3, 1917, said Cecil and Maud Dunlop…
2Cases cited15 opinions
- Barnes v. . MottNew York Court of Appeals · 1876
- Geib v. ReynoldsSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1886
- Bruse v. NelsonSupreme Court of Iowa · 1872
- Pearce v. BuellOregon Supreme Court · 1892
- Shaffer v. McCloskeyCalifornia Supreme Court · 1894
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- Iowa County Bank v. PittzWisconsin Supreme Court · 1927
- Westgard v. Farstad Oil, Inc.North Dakota Supreme Court · 1989
- Perry v. PerrySouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1928