Legal Opinion

George Taylor, III v. Attorney General Pennsylvania

Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit

Decided January 30, 2013No. 12-1660Unpublished

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

2Per curiam

George Taylor, a Pennsylvania prisoner, appeals from an order dismissing his habe-as corpus petition without prejudice for failure to exhaust state-court remedies. We will vacate and remand for further proceedings.

Because our decision today is narrow, we will not recite the factual history of this case, with which the parties are familiar. Taylor filed a 28 U.S.C. § 2254 petition in January 2010 (M.D.Pa.Civ. No. l:10-cv-00206), in which he appeared to challenge the processes used to issue a Pennsylvania state detainer, as well as the procedures surrounding a then-upcoming parole…

3Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Slack v. McDanielSupreme Court of the United States · 2000
  2. Coleman v. ThompsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1991
  3. Murray v. BledsoeCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2011
  4. United States v. Reginald McGloryCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2000
  5. Harper v. Oversight CommitteeCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2017

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API