Legal Opinion
Pao Xiong v. City of Moorhead, Minn.
District Court, D. Minnesota
Decided February 9, 2009No. Civil 08-27 (DWF/RLE)PublishedCited by 1 opinion
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER
DONOVAN W. FRANK, District Judge.
INTRODUCTION
This matter is before the Court upon a Motion for Summary Judgment brought by the Defendant City of Moorhead, Minnesota (the “City”). For the reasons set forth below, the Court grants in part and denies in part the City’s motion.
BACKGROUND
In January 2007, the City adopted municipal ordinance number 10-23-3, which governs the zoning for adult establishments. The ordinance restricts the location of adult businesses to the City’s light and heavy industrial districts. The ordinance also contains distance restrictions that…
2Cases cited19 opinions
- Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Broadrick v. OklahomaSupreme Court of the United States · 1973
- Ward v. Rock Against RacismSupreme Court of the United States · 1989
- Members of the City Council of Los Angeles v. Taxpayers for VincentSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by1 opinion
- Flirts, Inc. v. City of Harris, Minn.District Court, D. Minnesota · 2011