Legal Opinion

State v. Waicelunas

Court of Appeals of Arizona

Decided August 2, 1983No. 1 CA-CR 6283PublishedCited by 23 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

GRANT, Judge.

In this appeal the state raises the question of whether the trial court properly suppressed a blood alcohol test. On January 12, 1982, defendant Brad Waicelunas, was involved in a two-vehicle collision which was fatal to the other driver. Waicelunas was indicted on a charge of manslaughter, a class 3 dangerous felony. Phoenix Police Officers Paul Kent and Donald Dierks investigated the accident.

Officer Dierks, intending to administer a breathalyzer test, went to the hospital where the defendant was being treated. While setting up the test machinery, defendant indicated to…

2Cases cited14 opinions

  1. Schmerber v. CaliforniaSupreme Court of the United States · 1966
  2. Campbell v. Superior CourtArizona Supreme Court · 1971
  3. United States v. John Eldon Beck, United States of America v. John W. DickersonCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1979
  4. United States v. Mary Mae Harvey, United States of America v. Wallace ChaseCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1983
  5. State v. HaroldArizona Supreme Court · 1952

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by23 opinions

  1. State v. AultArizona Supreme Court · 1986
  2. State v. DawsonArizona Supreme Court · 1990
  3. State v. CocioArizona Supreme Court · 1985
  4. State v. WinegarArizona Supreme Court · 1985
  5. Montano v. Superior Court Pima CountyArizona Supreme Court · 1986

18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API