Legal Opinion

Reich v. Miller

Supreme Court of Iowa

Decided June 6, 1967No. 52575PublishedCited by 21 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtGarfield, C. J.

The important question this appeal presents is whether defendant’s alleged violation of the assured-clear-distance rule set out in section 321.285, Codes 1958, 1962, was properly submitted to the jury as a charge of negligence against him by plaintiff, driver of a car which came into the intersection of city streets defendant was approaching from the right. We hold it was error to submit this charge of negligence under the situation presented by the evidence.

This is the second appeal of the case. The first trial resulted in judgment on directed verdict for defendant on the ground of…

2Cases cited18 opinions

  1. Schultz v. GosselinkSupreme Court of Iowa · 1967
  2. Petty Et Ux. v. ClarkUtah Supreme Court · 1948
  3. Lawson v. FordyceSupreme Court of Iowa · 1945
  4. Shearer v. WeaverSupreme Court of Iowa · 1881
  5. Van Wie v. United StatesDistrict Court, N.D. Iowa · 1948

13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by21 opinions

  1. Unangst v. WhitehouseSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1975
  2. Springer v. Weeks & Leo Co., Inc.Supreme Court of Iowa · 1991
  3. Hillrichs v. Avco Corp.Supreme Court of Iowa · 1994
  4. Cannon v. TaborSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1994
  5. Coppola v. JamesonSupreme Court of Iowa · 1972

16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API