State v. Hoxsie
South Dakota Supreme Court
1Per curiam
[¶ 1.] A defendant died during the pen-dency of the appeal of his criminal action. The question before us is whether it should be dismissed on grounds of mootness or whether the action should be abated ab initio. We dismiss for mootness.
FACTS
[¶ 2.] James F. Hoxsie was indicted on charges of forgery, third-degree burglary, first-degree robbery, and commission of a felony while armed following his robbery of a Shop-N-Cart in Sioux Falls, South Dakota. He pled guilty to first-degree robbery; the remaining charges against him were dropped. He was sentenced to serve nineteen years in the state…
2Cases cited59 opinions
- Griffith v. KentuckySupreme Court of the United States · 1987
- Poulos v. New HampshireSupreme Court of the United States · 1953
- David A. Clarke v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1990
- Durham v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1971
- People v. DailCalifornia Supreme Court · 1943
54 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by17 opinions
- Surland v. StateCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 2006
- State v. CarlinAlaska Supreme Court · 2011
- State v. KorsenIdaho Supreme Court · 2005
- Ex Parte StateSupreme Court of Alabama · 2005
- Baldridge v. WeberSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 2008
12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.