Legal Opinion
Prince v. United States Lies Insurance
New York Supreme Court
Decided February 19, 1964PublishedCited by 10 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtSamuel H. Hofstadter, J.
Plaintiff sues upon a major medical expense policy issued by defendant, covering plaintiff, Ms wife, Ms daugMer and two sons. Subject to the limitations contained in the policy, defendant agreed to reimburse plaintiff *411for loss “ resulting from injury or sickness as defined in Part I of this policy.”
Bichard M. Prince, one of plaintiff’s sons, was involved in an accident on August 2, 1960. The resultant injury required the enucleation of his left eye. At the time of the accident he was a normal, healthy 10-year old. Further, his home life was happy and healthy, he got along well with his…
2Cases cited3 opinions
- McGrail v. Equitable Life Assurance Society of the United StatesNew York Court of Appeals · 1944
- Taylor v. United States Casualty Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1936
- Ætna Casualty & Surety Co. v. General Casualty Co. of AmericaAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1955
3Cited by10 opinions
- Marlowe Blake and Pam Blake v. Unionmutual Stock Life Ins. Co. Of AmericaCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 1990
- Malerbi v. Central Reserve Life of North America InsuranceNebraska Supreme Court · 1987
- County of Chemung v. Hartford Casualty InsuranceNew York Supreme Court · 1985
- Akins v. Washington Metropolitan Area Transit AuthorityDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 1990
- Feltenstein v. Travelers Indemnity Co.Appellate Terms of the Supreme Court of New York · 1966
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.