Legal Opinion
Taylor v. United States Casualty Co.
New York Court of Appeals
Decided January 7, 1936PublishedCited by 55 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtFinch, J.
This is a motion for summary judgment which was denied at Special Term. Upon appeal to the Appellate Division the order was affirmed by a divided court. Leave was thereupon granted by the Appellate Division to appeal to this court upon the certified question: “ Are the plaintiffs entitled to summary judgment on this record?”
The facts are undisputed and the appeal presents only questions of law.
The defendant insured one Charles H. Strong against, all claims which he should become legally liable to pay as damages arising out of bodily injuries accidentally sustained by any person or persons,…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- United States Fidelity & Guaranty Co. v. GuentherSupreme Court of the United States · 1930
- Gerka v. Fidelity & Casualty Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1929
- S. & E. Motor Hire Corp. v. New York Indemnity Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1930
- Marcus v. United States Casualty Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1928
- Brock v. Travelers InsuranceSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1914
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by55 opinions
- Seaboard Surety Co. v. Gillette Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1984
- Sperling v. Great American Indemnity Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1960
- 151 West Associates v. Printsiples Fabric Corp.New York Court of Appeals · 1984
- National Grange Mutual Insurance v. Continental Casualty InsuranceDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1986
- Peterson v. Grieger, Inc.California Supreme Court · 1961
50 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.