Coe v. State
Tennessee Supreme Court
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
DROWOTA,
delivered the opinion of the court,
in-which ANDERSON, C.J., HOLDER, and BARKER, JJ. joined.
The appellant, death row inmate Robert Glen Coe, challenges on both legal and factual grounds the trial court’s order of February 2, 2000, finding that he is presently competent to be executed under Ford v. Wainwright, 477 U.S. 899, 106 S.Ct. 2595, 91 L.Ed.2d 335 (1986) and Van Tran v. State, 6 S.W.3d 257 (Tenn.1999). 1 We have carefully reviewed de novo each of the legal claims raised by the appellant and conclude that none have merit. In addition, we have thoroughly reviewed the record…
Also in this document: Dissent.
2Cases cited41 opinions
- Daubert v. Merrell Dow Pharmaceuticals, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1993
- Morrissey v. BrewerSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
- Gregg v. GeorgiaSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
- Ake v. OklahomaSupreme Court of the United States · 1985
- Illinois v. AllenSupreme Court of the United States · 1970
36 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by56 opinions
- State v. BaneTennessee Supreme Court · 2001
- State v. NixTennessee Supreme Court · 2001
- State v. KeenTennessee Supreme Court · 2000
- Boyd v. Comdata Network, Inc.Court of Appeals of Tennessee · 2002
- State of Tennessee v. Marco M. NorthernTennessee Supreme Court · 2008
51 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.