Legal Opinion
State of Tennessee v. Marco M. Northern
Tennessee Supreme Court
Decided August 26, 2008No. M2005-02336-SC-R11-CDPublishedCited by 82 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtWilliam M. Barker, C.J.
in which CORNELIA A. CLARK, GARY R. WADE, and WILLIAM C. KOCH, JR., JJ., joined. JANICE M. HOLDER, J., concurring and dissenting.
*744OPINION
We granted this appeal to consider whether the courts below correctly held that Missouri v. Seibert, 542 U.S. 600, 124 S.Ct. 2601, 159 L.Ed.2d 643 (2004), does not bar the introduction into evidence of the defendant’s Mirandized2 videotaped confession which occurred after the defendant made an incriminating admission during a prior unwarned custodial interrogation. This Court has not previously interpreted and applied Seibert. After carefully considering the…
2Cases cited33 opinions
- Miranda v. ArizonaSupreme Court of the United States · 1966
- United States v. OlanoSupreme Court of the United States · 1993
- Gregg v. GeorgiaSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
- Rhode Island v. InnisSupreme Court of the United States · 1980
- Berkemer v. McCartySupreme Court of the United States · 1984
28 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by82 opinions
- State of Tennessee v. Courtney BishopTennessee Supreme Court · 2014
- State of Tennessee v. Fred Chad Clark, IITennessee Supreme Court · 2014
- State of Tennessee v. David Hooper Climer, Jr.Tennessee Supreme Court · 2013
- State of Tennessee v. Lemaricus Devall DavidsonTennessee Supreme Court · 2016
- State of Tennessee v. Howard Hawk WillisTennessee Supreme Court · 2016
77 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.