Legal Opinion

Baxter v. Crandall

Court of Appeals of Georgia

Decided March 17, 1932No. 21765PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the CourtJenkins, P. J.

1. “No suitor is entitled to prosecute two actions in the courts of this State at the same time, for the same cause, and against the same party, and in such a case the defendant may require the plaintiff to elect which he will prosecute, if commenced simultaneously; and the pendency of the former is a good defense to the latter, if commenced at different times.” Civil Code (1910), § 4331; Hood v. Cooledge, 39 Ga. App. 476 (147 S. E. 426).

2. The time of commencement of a suit is the date of filing as entered upon the petition by the clerk, where such filing is followed up by appropriate *126service…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Sweat v. BarnhillSupreme Court of Georgia · 1930
  2. McKnight v. WilsonSupreme Court of Georgia · 1924
  3. Hood v. CooledgeCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1929
  4. McDuffie Oil & Fertilizer Co. v. IlerCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1922
  5. Schermerhorn v. National Fire InsuranceCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1928

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Dowling v. LesterCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1946

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API