Legal Opinion
McKnight v. Wilson
Supreme Court of Georgia
Decided April 21, 1924No. 4176PublishedCited by 21 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtHines, J.
At the conclusion of the evidence the plaintiffs moved that the court direct a verdict in their favor, which the court refused to do. To this ruling the plaintiffs filed their exceptions pendente lite, and they assign error upon the ruling. The refusal of the court to direct a verdict is not error requiring a reversal in any case, even though such verdict could have been properly directed in favor of the complaining party. Easterling v. Cowart, 149 Ga. 161 (99 S. E. 301); Reed Oil Co. v. Smith, 154 Ga. 183, 185 (114 S. E. 56).
By agreement between counsel for both parties it was stipulated…
2Cases cited19 opinions
- Mauck v. RosserSupreme Court of Georgia · 1906
- Pelham & Havana Railroad v. ElliottCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1912
- Butler v. StateSupreme Court of Georgia · 1914
- Jordan v. Callaway & Co.Supreme Court of Georgia · 1912
- Bostwick v. PerkinsSupreme Court of Georgia · 1848
14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by21 opinions
- Grimmett v. BarnwellSupreme Court of Georgia · 1937
- Meacham v. BarberCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1987
- Roland v. SheltonCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1962
- Clements v. Sims T v. Inc.Court of Appeals of Georgia · 1962
- Harmon v. WigginsCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1934
16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.