Beers v. Aylsworth
Oregon Supreme Court
From Multnomah: Arthur L. Frazer, Judge. Supplemental proceeding by Lusetta P. Beers against C. A. Aylsworth, resulting in an adverse judgment, from which plaintiff appeals.
1Opinion of the CourtChief Justice Moore
delivered the opinion. ■
This is a proceeding to determine the liability of a garnishee. The transcript shows that the plaintiff, Lusetta P. Beers, having secured a judgment against one Robert Hanlin for the sum of $635.80, an execution was issued thereon, -in pursuance of which a notice of garnishment was served upon C. A. Aylsworth, who, complying therewith, made a certificate to the effect that he did not have in his possession or under his control any debts, dues, moneys, rights, credits, or property belonging to Hanlin. This certificate being unsatisfactory to plaintiff, she filed written…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Kelley v. HighfieldOregon Supreme Court · 1887
- Robson v. HamiltonOregon Supreme Court · 1902
- O'Hare v. DuckworthWashington Supreme Court · 1892
- Sebald v. MulhollandThe Superior Court of the City of New York and Buffalo · 1893
- Carver v. BarkerNew York Supreme Court · 1893
3Cited by4 opinions
- Vuilleumier v. Oregon Water Power & R. Co.Oregon Supreme Court · 1909
- Eaton v. BlackburnOregon Supreme Court · 1907
- Ireland v. WardOregon Supreme Court · 1908
- State v. WilliamsWashington Supreme Court · 1949