Legal Opinion

Carver v. Barker

New York Supreme Court

Decided December 8, 1893PublishedCited by 3 opinions

Appeal from special term, Broome county. Action by Elden R. Carver, as receiver, against David F. Barker and Ida B. Barker. From a judgment in favor of plaintiff, defendants appeal.

1Opinion of the CourtHardin, P. J.

After a perusal of the evidence bearing upon the vital issues in the case, the conclusion is reached that the trial court, was warranted in finding a fraudulent intent on the part of the husband, with the knowledge thereof in the wife, to the extent stated in the findings of fact made by the trial judge, and the opinion delivered by the trial judge meets with our approval. This case' differs quite essentially from Neuberger v. Keim, 134 N. Y. 36, 31 N. E. 268.

2. When Florence was upon the stand as a witness, he was allowed to state a conversation held with David F. Barker, and, upon *921objection…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Neuberger v. . KeimNew York Court of Appeals · 1892
  2. Scofield v. SpauldingNew York Supreme Court · 1889

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Hardee Trustees v. HortonSupreme Court of Florida · 1925
  2. Suffolk County v. ShawAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1897
  3. Beers v. AylsworthOregon Supreme Court · 1902

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API