Simmons v. State

ROONEY, Chief Justice.

Appellant, Curtis Wayne (Apache) Simmons, was convicted on a trial to the court of aiding and abetting delivery of á controlled substance in violation of §§ 6-1-114 1 and 35-7-1031(a)(ii) 2 , W.S.1977. He words the single issue on appeal as follows:

“Whether the evidence was insufficient to support Appellant’s conviction of aiding and abetting the delivery of a controlled substance.’’

We affirm.

Appellant acknowledges that the standard for review of the sufficiency of the evidence is “well-known” and “presents a formidable hurdle to an appellant.” We test the sufficiency of…