Legal Opinion

Commonwealth v. Petro

Superior Court of Pennsylvania

Decided October 29, 1934No. Appeal 443PublishedCited by 10 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opintou by

Kelleb, J.,

On the afternoon of Friday, January 26,1934, at 4:08 o’clock, four men armed with revolvers and sawed off shotguns entered the mill or plant of the Acme Coppersmithing & Machine Company, at Oreland, Pa. Two of them stayed at the door, and two went into the inner office of the company where one of them pointed a gun and compelled the clerks, who were preparing the payroll, and putting the money, (about $2,400), into envelopes for distribution, to pour the money into a bag, which they took away, after tearing the telephone from the wall. All four of them left the building…

2Cases cited16 opinions

  1. Commonwealth v. SparduteSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1923
  2. Commonwealth v. JonesSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1929
  3. Campbell v. CommonwealthSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1877
  4. Commonwealth v. MarionSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1911
  5. Commonwealth v. HabeckerSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1934

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by10 opinions

  1. Commonwealth v. PiloskySuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1976
  2. Commonwealth v. KramerSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1977
  3. Commonwealth v. BaranyaiSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1981
  4. Commonwealth v. MarkleSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1976
  5. Commonwealth v. KlickSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1979

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API