Legal Opinion

Rochester Plumbing Supply Co. v. A. Burgart, Inc.

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

Decided July 18, 1975PublishedCited by 16 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtSimons, J.

Defendant, Burgart, Inc., is a plumbing contractor and was the successful bidder for subcontract work on the construction of the Rochester sewage treatment plant. Specifications for the work required the use of either DeZurik or Magna Seal valves and in preparing its bid for the general contractor, Burgart used quotations for Magna Seal valves supplied by a representative of the manufacturer, third-party defendant W-K-M Valve Division of ACF Industries, Inc., in co-operation with W-K-M’s exclusive Rochester distributor, plaintiff, Rochester Plumbing Supply Co., Inc. After Burgart was awarded…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. Kooleraire Service & Installation Corp. v. Board of EducationNew York Court of Appeals · 1971
  2. R. J. Daum Const. Co. v. ChildUtah Supreme Court · 1952
  3. Molloy v. . City of New RochelleNew York Court of Appeals · 1910
  4. Schenectady Stove Co. v. . HolbrookNew York Court of Appeals · 1885
  5. Cortland Asbestos Products, Inc. v. J. & K. Plumbing & Heating Co.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1969

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by16 opinions

  1. Tubelite v. Risica & Sons, Inc.Texas Supreme Court · 1991
  2. Dynamics Corp. of America v. International Harvester Co.District Court, S.D. New York · 1977
  3. Colello v. ColelloAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2004
  4. Falcon Tankers, Inc. v. Litton Systems, Inc.Superior Court of Delaware · 1976
  5. King & Son, Inc. v. De Santis Construction No. 2 Corp.New York Supreme Court · 1977

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API