Tubelite v. Risica & Sons, Inc.
Texas Supreme Court
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
CORNYN, Justice.
At issue is whether an agreement to pay interest arose under the Uniform Commercial Code because of a course of dealing between two merchants. Finding that the parties’ course of dealing established an implied agreement to pay interest, the trial court rendered judgment for Tubelite, a Division of Indal, Inc. (“Tubelite”) and dismissed the counterclaim of Risica & Sons, Inc. (“Risica”) for penalties under the usury statute. TEX.REV.CIV.STAT.ANN. art. 5069-1.06 (Vernon 1987). The court of appeals, however, found no evidence of an implied agreement to pay interest, and…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- Triton Oil & Gas Corp. v. Marine Contractors and Supply, Inc.Texas Supreme Court · 1982
- Litton Industrial Products, Inc. v. GammageTexas Supreme Court · 1984
- Earl M. Jorgensen Co. v. Mark Construction, Inc.Hawaii Supreme Court · 1975
- Preston Farm & Ranch Supply, Inc. v. Bio-Zyme EnterprisesTexas Supreme Court · 1981
- Marr-Piper Co. v. BullisTexas Commission of Appeals · 1928
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by62 opinions
- City of Keller v. WilsonTexas Supreme Court · 2005
- Jelinek v. CasasTexas Supreme Court · 2010
- Wal-Mart Stores, Inc. v. GonzalezTexas Supreme Court · 1998
- PPG Industries, Inc. v. JMB/Houston Centers Partners Ltd. PartnershipTexas Supreme Court · 2004
- Rich Products Corp. v. Kemutec, Inc.District Court, E.D. Wisconsin · 1999
57 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.