Matter of Imprisonment of Stevens
Court of Appeals of North Carolina
1Opinion of the Court
MORRIS, Judge.
The State contends that the Superior Court did not have jurisdiction over the matters raised in the petitioner’s writ of habeas corpus. We agree.
The writ of habeas corpus is critically significant to American jurisprudence and as such must be considered a “ . . . precious safeguard of personal liberty. ...” 39 C.J.S., Habeas Corpus, § 1, p. 424. Moreover, in view of its importance historically and legally, the writ has been designed as an effective means of obtaining “ ... & speedy release of persons who are illegally deprived of their liberty or illegally detained. ...” 39 Am.…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- In Re BurtonSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1962
- Goble v. BoundsSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1972
- Jernigan v. StateSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1971
- State v. GarrisSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1965
3Cited by7 opinions
- Hoffman v. EdwardsCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1980
- State v. LeachCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 2013
- Freeman v. JohnsonCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1988
- Douglas v. N.C. Department of CorrectionNorth Carolina Industrial Commission · 2010
- State v. DawSupreme Court of North Carolina · 2024
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.