Legal Opinion
Miralda v. Gonzalez
Louisiana Court of Appeal
Decided February 4, 2015No. 2014-CA-0888PublishedCited by 27 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
ROSEMARY LEDET, Judge.
Lin this legal malpractice action, the plaintiff, Marco Tulio Miralda, appeals the trial court’s judgment granting the peremptory exception .of peremption filed by the defendants, Romauldo Gonzalez, Sr., and the Law Offices of Romauldo Gonzalez, L.L.C. d/b/a Braden Gonzalez and Associates (collectively “Mr. Gonzalez”). Because we find the trial court properly applied the one-year peremptive period set forth in La. R.S. 9:5605(A) and because we find the fraud exception set forth in La. R.S. 9:5605(E) is inapplicable, we affirm.
FACTUAL AND PROCEDURAL BACKGROUND
On July 19,…
2Cases cited46 opinions
- Stobart v. State Through DOTDSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1993
- Ross Milling Co. v. GilibertiLouisiana Court of Appeal · 1925
- Campo v. CorreaSupreme Court of Louisiana · 2002
- Reeder v. NorthSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1997
- London Towne Condo. Ass'n v. LONDON TOWNESupreme Court of Louisiana · 2006
41 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by27 opinions
- State v. ThompsonLouisiana Court of Appeal · 2016
- Barrasso Usdin Kupperman Freeman & Darver, L.L.C. v. BurchLouisiana Court of Appeal · 2015
- Ohle v. UhaltLouisiana Court of Appeal · 2017
- ETI, Inc. v. Buck Steel, Inc.Louisiana Court of Appeal · 2017
- McGee v. Allstate Ins. Co.Louisiana Court of Appeal · 2018
22 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.