Legal Opinion

Ohle v. Uhalt

Louisiana Court of Appeal

Decided February 1, 2017No. 2016-CA-0569PublishedCited by 9 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Judge Rosemary Ledet

11 This is a damages suit, based on an alleged fraudulent scheme, against four defendants. From the trial court’s judgment granting all four defendants’ peremptory exceptions of prescription and one defendant’s declinatory exception of lack of personal jurisdiction, the plaintiff appeals. For the reasons that follow, we affirm the trial court’s judgment in all respects except for the granting of the peremptory exception of prescription as to one of the defendants. We remand with instructions to conduct an evidentiary hearing on the prescription exception as to that one…

2Cases cited27 opinions

  1. International Shoe Co. v. WashingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 1945
  2. Helicopteros Nacionales De Colombia, S. A. v. HallSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
  3. Goodyear Dunlop Tires Operations, S. A. v. BrownSupreme Court of the United States · 2011
  4. J. McIntyre Machinery, Ltd. v. NicastroSupreme Court of the United States · 2011
  5. Rush v. SavchukSupreme Court of the United States · 1980

22 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. Crosstex Energy Servs., LP v. Tex. Brine Co.Louisiana Court of Appeal · 2018
  2. Akili Johari Senior v. Overlog Inc.Louisiana Court of Appeal · 2025
  3. Emerald Land Corp v. Trimont Energy (BL) L L CDistrict Court, W.D. Louisiana · 2021
  4. Gwen Ortega v. JW Marriott Investment, LLCDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 2025
  5. In Re Medical Review Panel Proceedings for the Claim of David Parker v. University Medical Center - New OrleansLouisiana Court of Appeal · 2023

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API