Piascik v. Industrial Commission

Two questions are presented by this record for determination in this court.

The first of these relates to the jurisdiction of the Court of Appeals to hear the error proceedings by reason of the mistake in the caption of the petition in error naming Joe Piascik as defendant in error instead of Michael Piascik.

The facts set forth in the foregoing statement make this question almost identical with that decided In the case of Vance v. Davis, Agent, 107 Ohio St., 577, 140 N. E., 588, the syllabus of which is as follows:

“1. The parties to a cause are not determined solely by the caption in that…