Legal Opinion
BAC, Inc. v. Board of Supervisors
Supreme Court of Pennsylvania
Decided November 10, 1993No. 83 W.D. Appeal Docket, 1991PublishedCited by 18 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
NIX, Chief Justice.
In this case, we must determine whether the Millcreek Township Board of Supervisors acted properly when it rejected a challenge to its zoning ordinance for allegedly excluding mobile homes in violation of our Constitution. Our decision will turn on whether the record contains sufficient evidence to rebut the presumption that the ordinance is constitutionally valid. For the reasons that follow, we hold that the Board acted properly.
This case arose out of the following set of facts. Appellant BAC, Inc., (BAC) owns a parcel of real estate in Millcreek Township…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- National Land & Investment Co. v. Easttown Township Board of AdjustmentSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1965
- Girsh AppealSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1970
- Concord Township AppealSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1970
- Surrick v. ZHB OF U. PROVIDENCE TP.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1977
- Township of Willistown v. Chesterdale Farms, Inc.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1975
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by18 opinions
- C & M Developers, Inc. v. Bedminster Township Zoning Hearing BoardSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 2002
- MacIoce v. Zoning Hearing BoardCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 2004
- Omnipoint Communications Enterprises, L.P., in No. 99-1990 v. Zoning Hearing Board of Easttown Township Township of Easton, in No. 99-1932Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2001
- Ficco v. Board of SupervisorsCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1996
- Herrit v. Code Management Appeal BoardCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1997
13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.