Legal Opinion
MacIoce v. Zoning Hearing Board
Commonwealth Court of Pennsylvania
Decided May 28, 2004PublishedCited by 24 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION BY
Senior Judge KELLEY.
The Borough of Baldwin (Borough) appeals from the order of the Court of Common Pleas of Allegheny County (trial court) which reversed the decision of the Zoning Hearing Board of the Borough of Baldwin (Board), and granted site-specific relief to Robert Macioce (Landowner) and Pittsburgh Cellular Telephone Company d/b/a A.T. & T. Wireless Services (AT & T) to construct a communications facility in the Borough’s Planned Residential Zoning District (PRD). We reverse.
Landowner owns a 70-acre parcel of land in the Borough’s PRD Zoning District. 1 On March 28, 2000,…
2Cases cited21 opinions
- Schubach v. SilverSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1975
- Apt Pittsburgh Limited Partnership v. Penn Township Butler County Of PennsylvaniaCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1999
- Beaver Gasoline Co. v. Osborne BoroughSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1971
- Ellick v. Bd. of Spvrs., Worcester Twp.Commonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1975
- Fernley v. Bd. of Sup'rs of Schuylkill Tp.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1985
16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by24 opinions
- Taliaferro v. Darby Tp. Zoning Hearing Bd.Commonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 2005
- Tri-County Landfill, Inc. v. Pine Township Zoning Hearing BoardCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 2014
- Interstate Outdoor Advertising, L.P. v. Zoning Hearing Board of Warrington TownshipCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 2012
- Larock v. Board of Supervisors of Sugarloaf TownshipCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 2008
- Smith v. Hanover Zoning Hearing BoardCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 2013
19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.