State v. MacKee, Ca2007-08-033 (4-21-2008)
Ohio Court of Appeals
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
{¶ 1} Defendant-appellant, Arthur Macke, appeals the decision of the Clinton County Court of Common Pleas denying his motion to suppress evidence.
{¶ 2} Appellant entered a plea of no contest and was found guilty of two felonies after the trial court denied his motion to suppress evidence.
{¶ 3} Appellant's single assignment of error avers that the trial court erred when it failed to suppress evidence gathered in the execution of a search warrant because the affidavit for the search warrant relied upon anonymous informants and, thus, was unsupported by probable cause, and the officers…
2Cases cited13 opinions
- Illinois v. GatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1983
- Hudson v. MichiganSupreme Court of the United States · 2006
- Wilson v. ArkansasSupreme Court of the United States · 1995
- State v. GeorgeOhio Supreme Court · 1989
- State v. WilmothOhio Supreme Court · 1986
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by2 opinions
- State v. NunezOhio Court of Appeals · 2008
- State v. King, Ca2008-03-085 (11-10-2008)Ohio Court of Appeals · 2008