Legal Opinion

State v. MacKee, Ca2007-08-033 (4-21-2008)

Ohio Court of Appeals

Decided April 21, 2008No. CA2007-08-033PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

{¶ 1} Defendant-appellant, Arthur Macke, appeals the decision of the Clinton County Court of Common Pleas denying his motion to suppress evidence.

{¶ 2} Appellant entered a plea of no contest and was found guilty of two felonies after the trial court denied his motion to suppress evidence.

{¶ 3} Appellant's single assignment of error avers that the trial court erred when it failed to suppress evidence gathered in the execution of a search warrant because the affidavit for the search warrant relied upon anonymous informants and, thus, was unsupported by probable cause, and the officers…

2Cases cited13 opinions

  1. Illinois v. GatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1983
  2. Hudson v. MichiganSupreme Court of the United States · 2006
  3. Wilson v. ArkansasSupreme Court of the United States · 1995
  4. State v. GeorgeOhio Supreme Court · 1989
  5. State v. WilmothOhio Supreme Court · 1986

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. State v. NunezOhio Court of Appeals · 2008
  2. State v. King, Ca2008-03-085 (11-10-2008)Ohio Court of Appeals · 2008

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API