Legal Opinion
State v. Rich
Supreme Court of Connecticut
Decided December 28, 1942PublishedCited by 17 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtElls, J.
The informations in these cases are identical except that in one Alexander Rich is charged with conspiring with Anthony Rich to maintain a gambling establishment for the purpose of taking bets on horse races, and in the other Anthony Rich is charged with conspiring with Alexander Rich for the same purpose. The defendants were tried together. They rested immediately upon the conclusion of the state’s testimony and claimed that the evidence was insufficient to prove guilt beyond a reasonable doubt. Both were found guilty, and they appealed.
It is unlawful to occupy a room with apparatus, books…
2Cases cited3 opinions
- State v. McDonoughSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1942
- State v. KempSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1939
- State v. GannonSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1902
3Cited by17 opinions
- State v. DeCosterSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1960
- State v. DeGennaroSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1960
- State v. HolmesSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1970
- State v. FicoSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1960
- State v. McLaughlinSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1945
12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.