Pioneer Valley Federal Credit Union v. Soja
Massachusetts District Court, Appellate Division
1Opinion of the Court
LoConto, EJ.
The parties presented competing motions for summary judgment before the trial judge. Aggrieved hy the denial of its motion and the allowance of the defendants motion, the plaintiff brought this appeal in accordance with District/Municipal Courts Rules of Appellate Division Appeal, Rule 8C. The following facts and issues are necessary for an understanding of this appeal. On or about October 11, 2001, the plaintiff brought a complaint against the defendant seeking judgment for the unpaid amount of money lent the defendants spouse for necessaries, specifically, car repairs. It is…
2Cases cited13 opinions
- United States v. Diebold, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1962
- Correllas v. ViveirosMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1991
- Board of Education v. Assessor of WorcesterMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1975
- Industrial Finance Corp. v. State Tax CommissionMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1975
- Coraccio v. Lowell Five Cents Savings BankMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1993
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- Cormier v. L'Oreal ParisMassachusetts District Court, Appellate Division · 2010
- Trinidad v. Pilgrim InsuranceMassachusetts District Court, Appellate Division · 2009
- Trustees of Laurelwood V Condominium Trust v. DuranteMassachusetts District Court, Appellate Division · 2010