Legal Opinion
Marley v. Wright
District Court, W.D. Oklahoma
Decided June 17, 1991No. CIV-90-974-PPublishedCited by 3 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
ORDER IMPOSING RULE 11 SANCTIONS
PHILLIPS, District Judge.
I. INTRODUCTION
Plaintiff Frank E. Marley, Jr. (“Marley”), a licensed attorney and member of the Oklahoma Bar Association and the Federal Bar for the Western District of Oklahoma, sued two state court judges, their court reporter, and others. With respect to the judges and court reporter, he alleged they violated his constitutional rights by conducting an in camera interview with his minor children who were the subject of a *361custody dispute between him and his ex-wife, and by refusing to provide him a transcript of the interview. Marley…
2Cases cited14 opinions
- Chambers v. Nasco, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1991
- Stump v. SparkmanSupreme Court of the United States · 1978
- Cooter & Gell v. Hartmarx Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1990
- Brown v. Board of EducationSupreme Court of the United States · 1954
- Butz v. EconomouSupreme Court of the United States · 1978
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- Davis v. Target Stores Division of Dayton Hudson Corp.District Court, D. Maryland · 2000
- Arbuckle Wilderness, Inc. v. KFOR-TV, Inc.District Court, W.D. Oklahoma · 1993
- Johnson v. McAdooDistrict Court, W.D. Oklahoma · 1993