Legal Opinion
Johnson v. McAdoo
District Court, W.D. Oklahoma
Decided September 16, 1993No. CIV-92-1197-APublishedCited by 1 opinion
1Opinion of the Court
ORDER
ALLEY, District Judge.
This matter came before the Court on the Motion For Rule 11 Sanctions filed by defendants Robert McAdoo, Claude Mansel, Wayne Rowe and Frank Walker, seeking an imposition of sanctions, pursuant to Fed. R.Civ.P. 11, against Nathan J. Gigger and Henry W. Floyd, former counsel for plaintiff Vivien A Johnson, in the above entitled and numbered cause. On June 11, 1993, the Court issued an Order ruling that the complaint filed by Gigger and Floyd on July 1, 1992, against McAdoo, Mansel, Rowe and Walker violated Rule 11, but reserving ruling on the nature of sanctions to…
2Cases cited11 opinions
- Kentucky v. GrahamSupreme Court of the United States · 1985
- Cooter & Gell v. Hartmarx Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1990
- Business Guides, Inc. v. Chromatic Communications Enterprises, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1991
- Frederick Lawrence White, Jr. Benjamin L. Staponski, Jr., and Gwen G. Caranchini v. General Motors Corporation, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1990
- Dodd Insurance Services, Inc. And Tom Dodd, Jr. v. Royal Insurance Company of America, an Illinois Corporation F/k/a Royal-Globe Insurance CompaniesCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1991
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by1 opinion
- Soo San Choi v. D'AppoloniaDistrict Court, W.D. Pennsylvania · 2008